Gandhi and hitler two moral opposites

gandhi and hitler two moral opposites A polar opposite of hitler (or napoleon) would be someone like gandhi or the dalai lama but as tyrannical conquerors go, you probably can't find two leaders as different as hitler and boney may 22, 2014.

“ethically they had arrived at the conclusion that man's supremacy over lower animals meant not that the former should prey upon the latter, but that the higher should protect the lower, and that there should be mutual aid between the two as between man and man. Even gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence failed against the reality of the nazi regime, leading gandhi himself to make such bizarre pronouncements as “hitler killed five million jews it is the greatest crime of our time. Gandhi's 1940 letter to hitler was actually his second addressed to the nazi leader the first, a very short missive written in 1939 , one month before the ill-fated soviet non-aggression pact , strikes a conciliatory tone. Hitler has the connotation of being the embodiment of evil therefore, anyone who, in your opinion, personifies goodness, selflessness, philanthropy, and is an asset to the human race would fit. All sins are equivalent and anyone is a sinner a christian is one that has discovered that god gives you grace to conceal their sins because of the fact the cost has already been paid in fact specific, to god christians could be morally reminiscent of hitler, yet so is all of us else interior the international via their very own efforts.

Mahatma gandhi was the most important moral leader of the 20th century his method for challenging unjust laws and conducting a revolution, nonviolent mass action, is ethically pure and also effective. Gandhi choose to use only one form of power that is moral power based on his own personal values, convictions and examples while hitler various forms of power such as coercive power, legitimate power gandhi’s followers were affected by internalization : commitment due to appeal to values, beliefs and self-image regardless of benefits and. In the late 1800 s and the early 1900 s the people of northern europe, southern africa and asia were in despair they had no leaders they were defenseless india had been taken over by the british empire and now the 315 million indians were under the rule of the 100 thousand british soldie. Gandhi practiced two types of satyagraha in his mass campaigns the first was civil disobedience, which entailed breaking a law and courting arrest this very un-hitlerian reason to befriend hitler, what gandhi goes on to call the doctrine of universal friendship, contrasts with the hitler-like hatred of one's enemy which is commonly.

The two men could not have been more opposite in terms of philosophy, yet in 1939 as the storm clouds gathered in europe gandhi felt it necessary to do something on the 23rd of july in 1939, gandhi wrote to hitler, saying that he (hitler) was “the one person in the world who can prevent a war which may reduce humanity to a savage state. First, you made a very basic mistake by asserting that moral relativism and moral objectivism are opposites they are not the proper dichotomies are: moral relativism vs moral absolutism, and moral subjectivism vs moral objectivism. Two great disciples of mohandas gandhi -- archbishop desmond tutu and the rev martin luther king jr -- absorbed the moral and strategic power of his nonviolence credo and courageously applied it to change history in south africa and the united states.

The exchange sparked an ongoing correspondence between the two that lasted until tolstoy’s death — a meeting of two great minds and spirits, eventually collected in letters from one: correspondence (and more) of leo tolstoy and mohandas gandhi and rivaled only by einstein’s correspondence with freud on violence and human nature. In fact, this is historically incorrect: in the early stages of world war ii, hitler wanted to strike a deal with the british, which would preserve the empire in exchange for german superiority on. Two of these leaders are mohandas gandhi and adolf hitler gandhi was mainly known for solving his people’s problems in a peaceful manner hitler was mainly known for being a dictator that started the holocaust. 2 surprisingly, gandhi and bin laden have some things in common both men have had, in their own era, a cult appeal and widespread following for their contests with western empire both men have had, in their own era, a cult appeal and widespread following for their contests with western empire. Margaret sanger famously took gandhi to task on this issue for years after the two first met in india in december 1935 incidentally, one of her most famous responses to him was published the same year and in the same magazine as gandhi's aforementioned essay.

Gandhi and hitler two moral opposites

D gandhi's way of fighting has two dimensions: one is to imagine a solution that includes the best features of both sides he pioneered what is now called the win-win approach to conflict resolution the second is even more innovative: to incorporate the solution into the struggle itself. Adolf hitler - infj submitted 2 years ago by liliewhite as we know, many people consider hilter was infj fortunately, for every hitler, there is a gandhi, and for every osama bin laden, there is a carl jung to give us all the tools for bettering ourselves and our world my theory is that we aim to be on the moral high-ground simply. Re: photo: gandhi's letter to hitler in which he addressed hitler 'dear friend' this proof of a relationship between ghandi's wishes and those of pro-whites certainly challenges the assertion that ghandi and hitler lie at opposite sides of the moral spectrum as advocated ad nauseum by the marxists on youtube.

Picking gandhi over hitler to share his lifeboat is discrimination, but morally necessary, husi argued if people were truly moral equals, picking between the two should be an impossible choice husi was inspired to write his paper after reading a paper by his mentor, george sher of rice university, that argued for the existence of moral equality. If you could get hitler and stalin to sit down together and avoid economics, the two diehard authoritarians would find plenty of common ground a word about neo-cons and neo-libs us neo-conservatives, with their commitment to high military spending and the global assertion of national values, tend to be more authoritarian than hard right. Mahatma gandhi by bertrand russell this article focuses on the early life of gandhi and what moulded him into the person he later became though gandhi was not tall and well built his indomitable will made him a man few would think of opposing.

The two years that gandhi was in jail saw, inter alia, communal riots all over the country, notably in calcutta in 1923 a year later, the riots in lucknow and gulbarga, and especially in kohat. Gandhi’s life was based on truth, honesty and moral courage mahatma gandhi was great national hero, who served the nation with truth and non violence gandhi was against violence. Christianity and really any other moral system you can think of will say hitler is evil and gandhi is good now where you go from there is another matter christianity has the concept of grace that means heaven and hell are not just determined by who is objectively, visibly good.

gandhi and hitler two moral opposites A polar opposite of hitler (or napoleon) would be someone like gandhi or the dalai lama but as tyrannical conquerors go, you probably can't find two leaders as different as hitler and boney may 22, 2014. gandhi and hitler two moral opposites A polar opposite of hitler (or napoleon) would be someone like gandhi or the dalai lama but as tyrannical conquerors go, you probably can't find two leaders as different as hitler and boney may 22, 2014.
Gandhi and hitler two moral opposites
Rated 3/5 based on 18 review

2018.